Section 18 of LA : Section 18: Effect Of Acknowledgment In Writing

LA

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Imagine that Ravi lent Rs. 100,000 to Arjun on January 1, 2010, with an agreement that Arjun would repay the loan by December 31, 2012. The limitation period for Ravi to file a suit to recover the money is three years from the due date, which means he has until December 31, 2015, to file a lawsuit. However, Ravi does not take any legal action within this period.

On November 15, 2015, just before the limitation period expires, Arjun sends a written letter to Ravi acknowledging that he still owes Ravi Rs. 100,000. The letter is signed by Arjun. This acknowledgment of debt restarts the limitation period from the date of the letter. Now, Ravi has a new deadline, which is three years from November 15, 2015, to file a lawsuit to recover his money.

If Arjun's acknowledgment letter had no date, Ravi could present oral evidence to prove when Arjun signed the letter. However, Ravi cannot use oral evidence to prove the contents of the letter because it must be in writing as per the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link