Section 161 of BSA : Section 161: What matters may be proved in connection with proved statement relevant under section 26 or 27.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Ravi is accused of theft and during police interrogation, he makes a statement that leads to the discovery of stolen goods. This statement is relevant under Section 27 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023. During the trial, Ravi's lawyer argues that the statement was made under duress and should not be considered credible. To support this claim, Ravi's lawyer presents evidence that Ravi was threatened by the police during the interrogation. The prosecution, on the other hand, brings in witnesses who testify that Ravi voluntarily made the statement and was not under any pressure. Here, both parties are allowed to present evidence to either contradict or corroborate Ravi's statement, as per Section 161.

Example 2:

Sita is a witness in a murder case and gives a statement to the police that implicates her neighbor, Ramesh. This statement is relevant under Section 26 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023. During the trial, Sita is called to testify, but she denies making the statement. The defense attorney then presents evidence that Sita has a history of lying and has previously made false accusations against others. The prosecution counters by presenting evidence that Sita has always been a reliable witness in past cases. Here, both the defense and prosecution are allowed to present evidence to either impeach or confirm Sita's credibility, as per Section 161.