Section 138 of BSA : Section 138: Accomplice.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Ravi and Suresh plan a bank robbery together. During the robbery, Ravi is caught by the police, but Suresh manages to escape. Ravi decides to cooperate with the police and testifies against Suresh in court. According to Section 138 of The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, Ravi, even though he was an accomplice in the crime, is considered a competent witness. The court can convict Suresh based on Ravi's testimony, provided there is additional evidence that supports Ravi's statements.

Example 2:

Priya and Anjali are involved in a scheme to embezzle funds from their employer. Priya is arrested and agrees to testify against Anjali in exchange for a reduced sentence. During the trial, Priya provides detailed information about how the embezzlement was carried out and Anjali's role in it. Under Section 138 of The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, Priya's testimony is admissible in court. The judge can convict Anjali based on Priya's testimony if there is corroborating evidence, such as financial records or witness statements, that supports Priya's account.