Section 134 of BSA : Section 134: Confidential communication with legal advisers.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Ravi is accused of embezzlement at his workplace. He hires a lawyer, Ms. Sharma, to defend him. During their meetings, Ravi confides in Ms. Sharma about various details of his case, including some sensitive information. When the case goes to trial, the prosecution demands that Ms. Sharma disclose what Ravi told her in confidence. According to Section 134 of The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, Ms. Sharma cannot be compelled to reveal these confidential communications in court. However, if Ravi decides to testify in his own defense, and his testimony includes information that needs clarification, the court may require him to disclose certain communications with Ms. Sharma that are necessary to explain his evidence.

Example 2:

Priya is involved in a civil lawsuit regarding a property dispute. She consults her legal adviser, Mr. Verma, and shares all the details of her case, including her strategy and personal opinions about the other party. During the trial, the opposing counsel requests that Mr. Verma disclose what Priya told him. Under Section 134 of The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, Mr. Verma is not obligated to disclose any confidential communications between him and Priya. However, if Priya chooses to take the stand and testify, and her testimony includes statements that need further explanation, the court may require her to reveal specific communications with Mr. Verma that are necessary to clarify her evidence.