Section 94 of BSA : Section 94: Evidence of terms of contracts, grants and other dispositions of property reduced to form of document.
BSA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Ravi and Suresh enter into a written contract where Ravi agrees to sell his house to Suresh for ₹50 lakhs. The contract is documented and signed by both parties. Later, a dispute arises where Suresh claims that Ravi had verbally agreed to include the furniture in the sale. According to Section 94 of The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, since the terms of the contract have been reduced to a written document, no oral evidence can be given to prove the inclusion of the furniture. Only the written contract will be considered as evidence.
Example 2:
Priya receives a grant from the government for her startup, and the terms of the grant are documented in an official grant letter. Later, Priya claims that a government official verbally promised additional funding. According to Section 94, only the documented grant letter can be used as evidence to prove the terms of the grant. Any verbal promises made by the official cannot be considered as evidence.
Example 3:
Anil and Sunita have a written agreement where Anil agrees to lease his shop to Sunita for a period of 5 years. ...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!