Section 53 of BSA : Section 53: Facts admitted need not be proved.
BSA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: Property Dispute
Context: Raj and Simran are involved in a property dispute over a piece of land. During the court proceedings, both parties agree in writing that the land in question was purchased by their grandfather and that they are the legal heirs.
Application of Section 53: Since both Raj and Simran have admitted in writing that the land was purchased by their grandfather and they are the legal heirs, this fact does not need to be proved in court. The court can proceed with the case based on this admission, unless it decides to require further proof at its discretion.
Example 2:
Scenario: Breach of Contract
Context: A company, XYZ Pvt. Ltd., and a supplier, ABC Traders, are in a legal dispute over a breach of contract. During the hearing, both parties agree that the contract was signed on 1st January 2022 and that the terms included a delivery schedule of 100 units per month.
Application of Section 53: Since both XYZ Pvt. Ltd. and ABC Traders have admitted these facts during the hearing, these facts do not need to be proved in court. The court can rely on these admissions to focus ...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!