Section 25 of BSA : Section 25: Admissions not conclusive proof, but may estop.
BSA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Ravi and Suresh are involved in a civil dispute over the ownership of a piece of land. During a conversation, Ravi admits to Suresh that he had borrowed money from Suresh to buy the land. Later, in court, Ravi denies that he borrowed any money from Suresh.
Application of Section 25: Ravi's admission to Suresh is not conclusive proof that he borrowed money, meaning it alone cannot definitively prove the fact in court. However, Ravi may be estopped (prevented) from denying the admission he made to Suresh because his earlier statement can be used against him to show inconsistency and lack of credibility.
Example 2:
Priya is suing her employer for wrongful termination, claiming she was fired without cause. During a meeting with her employer before the lawsuit, Priya admitted that she had been consistently late to work. In court, Priya argues that her termination was unj...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!