Section 20 of BSA : Section 20: When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Ravi and Suresh are in a legal dispute over a property agreement. Ravi claims that Suresh orally admitted to the terms of the agreement during a conversation. However, the original property agreement document is missing. According to Section 20 of The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, Ravi's claim about Suresh's oral admission is not relevant unless Ravi can prove that he is entitled to provide secondary evidence of the document's contents, such as a photocopy or a witness who saw the document. If Ravi can show that the original document is lost and he ...

Login to access all pages and read more content.

To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.