Article 385 of CoI : Article 385: Provision as to provisional Legislatures in States in Part B of the First Schedule: Omitted.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Scenario: Imagine it's the year 1955, and India has recently gained independence. The country is still in the process of organizing its states and their respective legislatures. States in Part B of the First Schedule, such as Hyderabad and Mysore, have provisional legislatures set up to manage state affairs temporarily.

Application: Article 385 provided guidelines for these provisional legislatures, ensuring they functioned until a more permanent legislative structure could be established. This was crucial for maintaining governance and order during the transitional period.

Outcome: By 1956, the reorganization of states was completed, and the need for provisional legislatures was eliminated. Therefore, Article 385 was omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, as it was no longer relevant.

Example 2:

Scenario: Consider a historian researching the legislative history of India. They come across references to provisional legislatures in states like Rajasthan and Madhya Bharat, which were part of Part B states in the First Schedule before 1956.

Application: The historian finds that Article 385 once provided the legal framework for these provisional legislatures. However, after the states were reorganized and integrated into a more stable structure, the article was omitted to reflect the new political reality.

Outcome: The historian understands that the omission of Article 385 by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, marked the end of the transitional phase for these states, signifying a move towards a more permanent and organized legislative system in India.