Article 363A of CoI : Article 363A: Recognition granted to Rulers of Indian States to cease and privy purses to be abolished.
CoI
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: Maharaja Raj Singh was the ruler of a princely state in India before the country gained independence in 1947. After independence, he was recognized by the President of India as the ruler of his state and was entitled to receive a privy purse, a payment made to him by the government as part of the agreement for his state's accession to India.
Application of Article 363A: After the commencement of the Constitution (Twenty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1971, Maharaja Raj Singh ceases to be recognized as the ruler of his state. Consequently, he no longer receives the privy purse payments. All rights and obligations related to the privy purse are extinguished, meaning Maharaja Raj Singh cannot claim any further payments from the government under this arrangement.
Example 2:
Scenario: Princess Meera Devi was recognized as the successor to the ruler of a princely state by the President of India before the Constitution (Twenty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1971. She was set to inherit the title and the privy purse payments upon the death of her father, the current ruler.
Application of Article 363A: With the commencement of the C...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!