Article 230 of CoI : Article 230: Extension of jurisdiction of High Courts to Union territories.

CoI

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Scenario: The Union Territory of Chandigarh does not have its own High Court. The Parliament decides to extend the jurisdiction of the Punjab and Haryana High Court to include Chandigarh.

Application:

  1. Parliament's Role: Parliament passes a law stating that the Punjab and Haryana High Court will have jurisdiction over Chandigarh.
  2. State Legislature's Limitation: The Punjab State Legislature cannot pass any law to change this jurisdiction. They cannot increase, restrict, or abolish the High Court's jurisdiction over Chandigarh.
  3. Governor's Reference: Any rules, forms, or tables for subordinate courts in Chandigarh that would normally require the Governor's approval will now require the President's approval instead.

Example 2:

Scenario: The Union Territory of Lakshadweep is currently under the jurisdiction of the Kerala High Court. The Parliament decides to exclude Lakshadweep from the jurisdiction of the Kerala High Court and bring it und...

Login to access all pages and read more content.

To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.

Update: Discover how KanoonGPT revolutionizes legal research! Watch our demo video on the homepage to see how you can chat with various legal sections using our innovative hybrid AI search. Enjoy free unlimited AI access for a limited time!
Update: Page bookmarking and open in new tab is now supported! Simply use your browser's bookmark manager to save this page for quick access later.
Update: All Judiciary Acts to be available within a week.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link