Section 46 of UAPA : Section 46: Admissibility Of Evidence Collected Through The Interception Of Communications
UAPA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Imagine a scenario where the police suspect an individual, named Rohan, of planning an act of terrorism. The police, with proper authorization, intercept Rohan's phone calls and emails under the provisions of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, and the Information Technology Act, 2000. During this interception, they gather evidence that suggests Rohan is indeed involved in planning an unlawful activity.
When Rohan is brought to trial under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!