Section 113 of TMA : Section 113: Procedure Where Invalidity Of Registration Is Pleaded By The Accused
TMA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Let's consider a hypothetical example: John owns a company that sells shoes under the registered trademark "QuickFeet". Peter starts a business and begins selling shoes under the same name "QuickFeet". John discovers this and charges Peter under Section 103 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 for using his registered trademark.
Peter, however, pleads that John's registration of the trademark is invalid because it was already in use by a different company in another country before John registered it. The court finds Peter's defence prima facie tenable. As per Section 113(1)(a), the court adjourns ...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!