Section 30 of SRA : Section 30: Court May Require Parties Rescinding To Do Equity

Explanation using Example

Imagine John sells his car to Mike under the belief that the car is a rare model. Later, John discovers that the car is not rare but a common model. He sues Mike to rescind the contract on the grounds of misrepresentation. The court decides in John's favor and orders the rescission of the contract. However, John has used the car for a few months. Under Section 30 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the court may require John to compensate Mike for the use of the car during those months as a condition of the rescission, ensuring fairness to both parties.