Section 104A of The Patents Act, 1970, PA : Section 104A: Burden Of Proof In Case Of Suits Concerning Infringement

The Patents Act, 1970, PA

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Let's consider a hypothetical scenario for the application of Section 104A of The Patents Act, 1970. Assume that Company A holds a patent for a unique process of manufacturing a certain type of eco-friendly plastic. Company B starts selling a new type of eco-friendly plastic that is identical to the one produced by Company A's patented process. Company A suspects that Company B is infringing on their patent but is unable to determine the exact process used by Company B despite reasonable efforts.

In a lawsuit filed by Company A against Company B for patent infringement, the court, under Section 104A, may direct Company B to prove that their process of obtaining the identical product is different from Company A's patented process. However, the court will not require Company B to disclose any manufacturing or commercial secrets if it deems it unreasonable to do so. Also, it's important that Company A first proves that the product made by Company B is identical to the product directly obtained by their patented process.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.
Update: KanoonGPT Chat interface is launched for beta testing. Try it out here

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link