Section 139 of NIA : Section 139: Presumption In Favour Of Holder
NIA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Imagine a scenario where John issues a cheque to Mike as payment for a laptop Mike sold to him. Later, the cheque bounces due to insufficient funds in John's account. Under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the court will presume that Mike, the holder of the cheque, received this cheque from John as a payment (either full or partial) for the laptop. It is then up to John to prove otherwise if he wants to contest this presumption and show that the cheque was not meant for the discharge of any debt or other liability.
Update: Our Pro subscription pricing is now simplified. See our Pro plans
Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.