Section 144 of MVA : Section 144: Omitted
MVA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
An example of the application of the omitted Section 144 of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before it was omitted, could be a situation where a state government had rules that conflicted with the central Motor Vehicles Act. If Section 144 had not been omitted, it would have had an overriding effect, meaning the provisions of the central Motor Vehicles Act would take precedence over any conflicting state rules. Since Section 144 has been omitted, this specific overriding provision no longer applies, and any conflicts would need to be resolved without reference to it.
Update: Our Pro subscription pricing is now simplified. See our Pro plans
Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.
Update: KanoonGPT Chat interface is launched for beta testing. Try it out here