Section 17 of MVA : Section 17: Orders Refusing Or Revoking Driving Licences And Appeals Therefrom

MVA

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Imagine Sarah applies for a learner's licence to drive a car. The local Regional Transport Office (RTO) reviews her application and finds that she has not passed the required vision test. As per Section 17(1) of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the RTO refuses to issue the learner's licence and communicates this decision to Sarah in writing, providing the reason that she failed the vision test.

Sarah believes that there has been a mistake in her vision test results and feels aggrieved by the RTO's decision. She decides to appeal this decision. Following Section 17(2), Sarah files an appeal to the prescribed authority within thirty days of receiving the refusal order. The appellate authority schedules a hearing where Sarah and the RTO present their cases. After considering both sides, the appellate authority decides in Sarah's favor, finding that there was indeed an error in her vision test results. This decision is binding on the RTO, and they are now required to process Sarah's application for a learner's licence again.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.
Update: KanoonGPT Chat interface is launched for beta testing. Try it out here

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link