Section 73 of ITA, 2000 : Section 73: Penalty For Publishing Electronic Signature Certificate False In Certain Particulars

ITA, 2000

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Let's consider a hypothetical scenario to understand the application of Section 73 of the Information Technology Act, 2000:

Mr. A runs a popular e-commerce website. One day, he comes across an electronic signature certificate that was not issued by any certifying authority. Despite knowing this, he decides to publish this certificate on his website. The certificate falsely claims that it was issued by a renowned certifying authority and that it was accepted by a certain subscriber.

Later, it is discovered that the certificate was actually revoked earlier. However, Mr. A had published it not for the purpose of verifying an electronic signature created prior to its revocation, but to mislead his customers into believing that his website has a high level of security.

Such an action by Mr. A is a clear violation of Section 73 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. As per the law, Mr. A can be punished with imprisonment for up to two years, or a fine up to one lakh rupees, or both.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.
Update: KanoonGPT Chat interface is launched for beta testing. Try it out here

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link