Section 52D of ITA, 2000 : Section 52D: Decision By Majority
ITA, 2000
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Let's consider a hypothetical scenario where an Appellate Tribunal is hearing a case related to a cybercrime committed under the Information Technology Act, 2000. The bench consists of two members, Member A and Member B. They are reviewing the case, but they reach a disagreement on a specific point - whether the defendant's act constitutes a violation of a certain clause of the Act.
Member A believes that the defendant's act is a vio...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
Update: Discover how KanoonGPT revolutionizes legal research! Watch our demo video on the homepage to see how you can chat with various legal sections using our innovative hybrid AI search. Enjoy free unlimited AI access for a limited time!
Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.