Section 113 of IEA : Section 113: Proof of cession of territory.

IEA

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

The Government of India publishes a notification in the Official Gazette stating that a portion of British territory, specifically a region in present-day Karnataka, was ceded to the Mysore Kingdom on January 1, 1920. According to Section 113 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, this notification serves as conclusive proof that the cession of this territory to the Mysore Kingdom was valid and took place on the specified date. Therefore, any legal disputes or questions regarding the validity of this cession are resolved by referring to this notification.

Example 2:

A historical land dispute arises in a court in Rajasthan, where a party claims that a certain area was never legally ceded to the local princely state before India's independence. The opposing party presents a notification from the Official Gazette dated March 15, 1930, which states that the disputed area was ceded to the princely state of Jodhpur. Under Section 113 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the court accepts this notification as conclusive proof that the territory was indeed ceded to Jodhpur on the mentioned date, thereby resolving the dispute in favor of the opposing party.

Prepare for AIBE 20 with KanoonGPT

AI-powered study plan, past-paper analysis and full-length mock tests - tailored feedback to boost your score.