Section 101 of IEA : Section 101: Burden of proof.
IEA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Ravi claims that his neighbor, Suresh, has built a wall that encroaches on his property. Ravi files a case in court seeking the removal of the wall. According to Section 101 of The Indian Evidence Act 1872, Ravi must provide evidence to prove that the wall indeed encroaches on his property. This could include property documents, a surveyor's report, or any other relevant evidence. The burden of proof lies on Ravi to establish the facts he asserts.
Example 2:
Priya accuses her colleague, Anil, of stealing her laptop from their office. Priya files a police complaint and the case goes to court. Under Section 101 of The Indian Evidence Act 1872, Priya must provide evidence to prove that Anil stole her laptop. This could include CCTV footage, witness testimonies, or any other relevant evidence. The burden of proof is on Priya to prove the facts she claims.
Example 3:
Sunita c...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
In fact, any online course, certificate program, diploma in International Law, Technology Law, or whatever-new-hype-they-invent is usually just marketing sugarcoat. Don't let them sell you a PDF or Recorded Content and call it empowerment.
A course designed to truly empower you should be accessible — and preferably, free. That's why KanoonGPT will launch a Free AI 101 for Law Professionals course.
Also, quick reality check: Indians earn in INR ₹₹₹ — why on earth are we paying in Dollars $$$ for AI tools ? 🤨 Something doesn't add up.