Section 132 of IEA : Section 132: Witness not excused from answering on ground that answer will criminate.
IEA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: A bank fraud case is being heard in court. The prosecution calls Mr. Sharma, a bank employee, as a witness. During the questioning, Mr. Sharma is asked whether he was aware of any fraudulent transactions that took place in the bank.
Application of Section 132: Mr. Sharma cannot refuse to answer the question on the grounds that his answer might incriminate him or expose him to penalties. He must answer the question truthfully. However, the law protects him by ensuring that his answer cannot be used to arrest or prosecute him for the fraud, except if he lies under oath.
Outcome: Mr. Sharma answers that he was aware of the fraudulent tr...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
In fact, any online course, certificate program, diploma in International Law, Technology Law, or whatever-new-hype-they-invent is usually just marketing sugarcoat. Don't let them sell you a PDF or Recorded Content and call it empowerment.
A course designed to truly empower you should be accessible — and preferably, free. That's why KanoonGPT will launch a Free AI 101 for Law Professionals course.
Also, quick reality check: Indians earn in INR ₹₹₹ — why on earth are we paying in Dollars $$$ for AI tools ? 🤨 Something doesn't add up.