Section 67A of IEA : Section 67A: Proof as to electronic signature.

IEA

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Ravi is a businessman who enters into a contract with Suresh through an online platform. Ravi signs the contract using an electronic signature. Later, Suresh disputes the contract, claiming that the electronic signature on the document is not Ravi's. According to Section 67A of The Indian Evidence Act 1872, Ravi must prove that the electronic signature on the contract is indeed his. This could involve presenting evidence such as the digital certificate issued by a certifying authority, logs from the electronic signing process, or other technical means to verify the authenticity of the electronic signature.

Example 2:

Priya receives an email from her bank asking her to sign an electronic document to update her account details. She uses her electronic signature to sign the document. A few weeks later, Priya notices unauthorized transactions in her account and suspects that someone might have tampered with the document. She contacts the bank, and the bank alleges that the electronic signature on the document is not Priya's. Under Section 67A of The Indian Evidence Act 1872, the bank must prove that the electronic signature on the document is indeed Priya's. This could involve providing evidence such as the audit trail of the electronic signing process, the digital certificate used, and any other relevant technical data to establish the authenticity of the electronic signature.