Section 58 of IEA : Section 58: Facts admitted need not be proved.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Scenario: A property dispute case in a civil court in Mumbai.

Details:

• Parties: Mr. Sharma (Plaintiff) and Mr. Verma (Defendant)
• Dispute: Ownership of a piece of land.

Application of Section 58:

• During the pre-trial stage, both Mr. Sharma and Mr. Verma agree in writing that Mr. Sharma is the legal heir of the original owner of the land.
• Since both parties have admitted this fact in writing, there is no need for Mr. Sharma to prove his legal heirship during the trial.
• The court accepts this admission and focuses on other disputed facts, such as the validity of the sale deed presented by Mr. Verma.

Example 2:

Scenario: A criminal case involving theft in a Delhi court.

Details:

• Parties: State (Prosecution) vs. Mr. Singh (Defendant)
• Dispute: Whether Mr. Singh was present at the scene of the crime.

Application of Section 58:

• During the trial, Mr. Singh's lawyer admits in open court that Mr. Singh was indeed present at the scene of the crime but argues that he was there for a legitimate reason.
• Since Mr. Singh's presence at the scene is admitted, the prosecution does not need to provide further evidence to prove this fact.
• The court then focuses on whether Mr. Singh's presence was for a legitimate reason or if he was involved in the theft.

Example 3:

Scenario: A contractual dispute in a commercial court in Bangalore.

Details:

• Parties: ABC Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) vs. XYZ Ltd. (Defendant)
• Dispute: Breach of contract regarding the supply of goods.

Application of Section 58:

• Before the hearing, both companies agree in writing that the contract was signed on 1st January 2022 and that the terms of the contract were as stated in the document.
• Since both parties have admitted these facts in writing, there is no need to prove the existence and terms of the contract during the trial.
• The court then focuses on whether XYZ Ltd. breached the contract by failing to supply the goods as agreed.

Example 4:

Scenario: A family law case involving child custody in a Chennai court.

Details:

• Parties: Mrs. Reddy (Mother) vs. Mr. Reddy (Father)
• Dispute: Custody of their minor child.

Application of Section 58:

• During the hearing, both parents agree that the child is currently living with the mother and attending a specific school.
• Since both parties have admitted these facts in court, there is no need to provide additional evidence to prove the child's current living situation and school attendance.
• The court then focuses on determining the best interests of the child for future custody arrangements.