Section 6 of IEA : Section 6: Relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

A is accused of robbing a bank in Mumbai. During the robbery, A's accomplice, B, was seen outside the bank acting as a lookout. After the robbery, A and B were seen together at a nearby café discussing the robbery and dividing the stolen money. Even though the conversation at the café happened after the robbery, it is relevant to the case because it forms part of the same transaction.

Example 2:

C is accused of assaulting D in a public park in Delhi. Witnesses saw C and D arguing loudly before the assault. After the assault, C was seen running away from the park and disposing of a weapon in a nearby trash bin. The argument before the assault and C's actions after the assault are relevant facts because they are connected to the same transaction of the assault.

Example 3:

E is accused of committin...

Login to access all pages and read more content.

To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.