Section 47 of IEA : Section 47: Opinion as to handwriting, when relevant.
IEA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: A dispute arises over the authenticity of a will purportedly signed by Mr. Sharma, a wealthy businessman from Mumbai.
Application: The court needs to determine whether the signature on the will is indeed Mr. Sharma's. Mr. Verma, Mr. Sharma's long-time personal assistant, has seen Mr. Sharma sign numerous documents over the years. Additionally, Mr. Gupta, Mr. Sharma's business partner, has regularly received signed documents from Mr. Sharma in the course of their business dealings. Both Mr. Verma and Mr. Gupta can provide their opinions on whether the signature on the will matches Mr. Sharma's handwriting. Their opinions are relevant under Section 47 of The Indian Evidence Act 1872.
Example 2:
Scenario: A company in Delhi receives a letter demanding payment, allegedly sig...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!