Section 45 of IEA : Section 45: Opinions of experts.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

A high-profile murder case is being tried in a court in Mumbai. The victim, Mr. Sharma, was found dead in his apartment, and the police suspect that he was poisoned. The prosecution brings in Dr. Mehta, a forensic toxicologist, to testify. Dr. Mehta explains the symptoms of the poison found in Mr. Sharma's body and confirms that these symptoms match those observed in Mr. Sharma's case. The court considers Dr. Mehta's expert opinion as relevant evidence to determine whether Mr. Sharma's death was caused by poison.

Example 2:

In a civil dispute over a will in Delhi, the authenticity of the deceased's signature on the will is questioned. The plaintiff claims that the signature is forged. The court calls upon Mr. Verma, a handwriting expert, to compare the signature on the will with other documents known to have been signed by the deceased. Mr. Verma analyzes the handwriting characteristics and provides his expert opinion that the signature on the will matches the known signatures of the deceased. The court uses Mr. Verma's expert opinion to decide on the authenticity of the will.

Example 3:

A criminal case in Bangalore involves a suspect, Mr. Rao, who is accused of committing a crime while allegedly suffering from a mental disorder. The defense argues that Mr. Rao was not in a sound state of mind at the time of the crime and was incapable of understanding the nature of his actions. The court seeks the opinion of Dr. Kapoor, a renowned psychiatrist. Dr. Kapoor examines Mr. Rao and reviews his medical history, concluding that Mr. Rao's symptoms indicate a severe mental disorder that likely impaired his ability to understand his actions. The court considers Dr. Kapoor's expert opinion to determine Mr. Rao's mental state at the time of the crime.

Example 4:

In a corporate fraud case in Chennai, the authenticity of certain financial documents is in question. The defense claims that the documents were forged. The court appoints Ms. Iyer, a forensic document examiner, to analyze the documents. Ms. Iyer compares the questioned documents with other verified documents from the company and provides her expert opinion that the documents in question were indeed forged. The court uses Ms. Iyer's expert opinion to make a decision regarding the authenticity of the financial documents.

Example 5:

A case in Kolkata involves a dispute over the authorship of a famous painting. The plaintiff claims that the painting was created by a renowned artist, while the defendant argues that it is a forgery. The court calls upon Mr. Banerjee, an art expert, to examine the painting. Mr. Banerjee analyzes the brush strokes, materials used, and other artistic techniques, and provides his expert opinion that the painting is indeed an original work by the renowned artist. The court considers Mr. Banerjee's expert opinion to resolve the dispute over the painting's authenticity.