Section 40 of IEA : Section 40: Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial.
IEA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Ravi files a lawsuit against Suresh claiming ownership of a piece of land. The court examines the case and delivers a judgment in favor of Suresh, stating that Suresh is the rightful owner of the land. A year later, Ravi files another lawsuit against Suresh for the same piece of land, claiming ownership again. In this scenario, the previous judgment in favor of Suresh is a relevant fact that prevents the c...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
Update: Discover how KanoonGPT revolutionizes legal research! Watch our demo video on the homepage to see how you can chat with various legal sections using our innovative hybrid AI search. Enjoy free unlimited AI access for a limited time!
Update: Page bookmarking and open in new tab is now supported! Simply use your browser's bookmark manager to save this page for quick access later.
Update: All Judiciary Acts to be available within a week.
Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app
