Section 54 of IEA : Section 54: Previous bad character not relevant, except in reply.
IEA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Ravi is on trial for theft. During the trial, the prosecution wants to introduce evidence that Ravi has been convicted of theft multiple times in the past. According to Section 54 of The Indian Evidence Act 1872, this evidence of Ravi's previous bad character is not relevant and cannot be introduced unless Ravi himself introduces evidence of his good character. If Ravi's defense team presents witnesses to testify that Ravi is an honest and law-abiding citizen, then the prosecution can introduce evidence of Ravi's past convictions to counter this claim.
Example 2:
Sita is accused of fraud. During the trial, the prosecution attempts to introduce evidence that Sita has a history of committing fraud in her previous jobs. According to Section 54, this evidence is not rele...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!