Section 52 of IEA : Section 52: In civil cases character to prove conduct imputed, irrelevant.

IEA

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Ravi files a civil lawsuit against his neighbor, Suresh, claiming that Suresh has illegally encroached on his property. During the trial, Suresh's lawyer tries to introduce evidence that Ravi has a reputation for being dishonest and untrustworthy in the community. According to Section 52 of The Indian Evidence Act 1872, this evidence about Ravi's character is irrelevant to the case. The court will not consider Ravi's character in determining whether Suresh has encroached on Ravi's property.

Example 2:

Meena sues a construction company for breach of contract, alleging that the company failed to complete the construction of her house on time. The construction company's lawyer attempts to present evidence that Meena has a history of being difficult to work with and has previously been involved in multiple lawsuits. Under Section 52 of The Indian Evidence Act 1872, such evidence about Meena's character is irrelevant to the issue of whether the construction company breached the contract. The court will focus on the facts related to the contract and the alleged breach, not on Meena's character.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link