Section 23 of IEA : Section 23: Admissions in civil cases when relevant.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Ravi and Suresh are involved in a civil dispute over a piece of land. During a private negotiation, Ravi admits to Suresh that he does not have the original documents to prove his ownership. However, Ravi makes this admission on the condition that Suresh will not use this statement as evidence in court. Later, when the case goes to trial, Suresh tries to present Ravi's admission as evidence. According to Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872, this admission is not relevant because it was made on the express condition that it would not be used as evidence.

Example 2:

Anita and Priya are in a civil lawsuit regarding a breach of contract. During a mediation session, Anita admits that she did not fulfill her part of the contract. However, this admission is made in a confidential setting where both parties have agreed that any statements made during mediation will not be used as evidence in court. When Priya attempts to use Anita's admission in the trial, the court will deem it irrelevant under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872, as it was made under circumstances indicating an agreement that it should not be used as evidence.