Section 22 of IEA : Section 22: When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant.
IEA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Ravi and Suresh are in a dispute over a property sale agreement. Ravi claims that Suresh orally admitted to certain terms of the agreement during a conversation. However, the actual written agreement is missing. According to Section 22 of The Indian Evidence Act 1872, Ravi cannot use Suresh's oral admission about the contents of the document as evidence unless Ravi can prove that he is entitled to present secondary evidence of the document's contents, such as a copy or a witness...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!