Section 114A of IEA : Section 114A: Presumption As To Absence Of Consent In Certain Prosecution For Rape
IEA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Imagine a scenario where a woman has filed a case of rape against a man. During the trial, it is established that sexual intercourse did occur between the accused and the woman. The central issue becomes whether the intercourse was consensual. The woman testifies in court that she did not give her consent. According to Section 114A of the Indian Evidence Act, the court is then required to presume that the sexual intercourse was not consensual. This shifts the burden of proof to the accused, who must now demonstrate that the intercourse was consensual to avoid a conviction for rape.
Update: Discover how KanoonGPT revolutionizes legal research! Watch our demo video on the homepage to see how you can chat with various legal sections using our innovative hybrid AI search. Enjoy free unlimited AI access for a limited time!
Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.