Section 47 of IEA : Section 47: Opinion As To Handwriting, When Relevant

Explanation using Example

Imagine a scenario where there is a dispute over the authenticity of a signed contract that is crucial in a business lawsuit. The contract appears to be signed by Mr. Sharma, a well-known businessman. The court needs to determine if the signature on the contract is indeed Mr. Sharma's.

Ms. Patel, who has worked closely with Mr. Sharma for years and is familiar with his signature because she has seen him sign various documents, is asked to provide her opinion. Mr. Gupta, another businessman who has exchanged signed correspondence with Mr. Sharma, also gives his view. Additionally, Mr. Sharma's personal secretary, who handles his signed letters and documents daily, offers her perspective.

The opinions of Ms. Patel, Mr. Gupta, and the secretary are considered relevant facts under Section 47 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872, as they are acquainted with Mr. Sharma's handwriting and can assist the court in forming an opinion about the authenticity of the signature on the contract.