Section 45 of IEA : Section 45: Opinions Of Experts

IEA

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Imagine a scenario where a valuable painting is discovered and there is a dispute regarding its authenticity. The painting is attributed to a famous artist, but its origin is questioned. To resolve the issue, the court may rely on Section 45 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

In this case, the court would seek the opinion of art experts who specialize in the works of the artist in question. These experts would examine the painting's style, technique, materials used, and other relevant factors. Their expert testimony would help the court determine whether the painting is an original work of the artist or a forgery.

The expert's opinion, in this context, serves as a relevant fact for the court to form its opinion on the authenticity of the painting, thus applying Section 45 of the Act.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link