Section 6 of IEA : Section 6: Relevancy Of Facts Forming Part Of Same Transaction

Explanation using Example

Imagine that a person named Rahul is on trial for the theft of a motorcycle. During the trial, the prosecution presents CCTV footage from a nearby store, showing Rahul looking at motorcycles similar to the one stolen just an hour before the theft occurred. Even though the footage does not show the theft itself, it is considered relevant under Section 6 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 because it is connected with the theft and forms part of the same transaction, indicating Rahul's possible interest in motorcycles shortly before the theft took place.