Section 27 of IEA : Section 27: How Much Of Information Received From Accused, May Be Proved

IEA

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Imagine a situation where a man is arrested for theft and while in custody, he tells the police that he hid the stolen jewelry in his backyard. The police go to the backyard, dig at the spot indicated by the accused, and find the jewelry. According to Section 27 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the part of the accused's statement that directly led to the discovery of the jewelry ("I hid the jewelry in my backyard") can be admitted in court as evidence, even though the rest of his statement may be inadmissible as it was made in police custody.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link