Section 192 of ICA : Section 192: Representation Of Principal By Sub-Agent Properly Appointed

ICA

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Imagine Mr. Sharma, who owns a large textile business, hires Mr. Gupta as his agent to manage certain transactions. Mr. Gupta, with Mr. Sharma's consent, appoints Ms. Iyer as a sub-agent to purchase cotton from farmers. Ms. Iyer, acting within the scope of her authority, enters into contracts with the farmers and purchases cotton on behalf of Mr. Sharma.

In this scenario, Mr. Sharma is bound by the actions of Ms. Iyer as if he had appointed her himself, because Mr. Gupta properly appointed her as a sub-agent. If Ms. Iyer makes any decisions that are detrimental to Mr. Sharma's business, Mr. Gupta is responsible to Mr. Sharma for those actions. However, Ms. Iyer is responsible to Mr. Gupta for her actions and not directly to Mr. Sharma, unless she commits fraud or a wilful wrong.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.
Update: KanoonGPT Chat interface is launched for beta testing. Try it out here

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link