Skip to content

Section 7 – Prostitution In Or In The Vicinity Of Public Places

The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956

Explanation using examples

Imagine a scenario where there is a residential building located within 150 metres of a local school. The owner of the building, Mr. Sharma, rents out one of the apartments to Mr. Roy without inquiring into Mr. Roy's intentions for the property. It later comes to light that Mr. Roy has been using the apartment for prostitution.

Under Section 7 of The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, both Mr. Roy, who carried on prostitution, and the individuals involved with him would be liable for punishment due to the proximity of the apartment to the school, which is less than 200 metres.

Furthermore, Mr. Sharma, as the owner of the premises, could also face legal consequences for permitting the use of his property for prostitution, either knowingly or due to negligence in not verifying the intended use of the apartment by Mr. Roy. If convicted, Mr. Sharma could be subject to imprisonment, a fine, or both.

If the act of prostitution involved a minor or a child, the penalties would be more severe, with the possibility of imprisonment for a minimum of seven years, as stipulated by the act.

In addition, if the local government had previously notified the area as one where prostitution is not to be carried on, the penalties could be further enhanced, and Mr. Sharma could face even stricter legal repercussions.

On mobile

Read digital bare acts in the app

Browse section-wise Indian bare acts on your phone or tablet with the Kanoon Library app.

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store