Section 31 of DCA : Section 31: Confiscation
DCA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Imagine a local pharmacy where an inspection by a drug inspector reveals that a batch of medication sold there is counterfeit, which is considered a spurious drug under Section 17B of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The owner of the pharmacy is subsequently convicted for selling these spurious drugs. As a result of the conviction, according to Section 31(1)(i) of the Act, not only is the batch...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
🚀 Special Offer! Enjoy 1 Year of Ad-Free Browsing with any subscription.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!
Update: Discover how KanoonGPT revolutionizes legal research! Watch our demo video on the homepage to see how you can chat with various legal sections using our innovative hybrid AI search. Enjoy free unlimited AI access for a limited time!
Update: Page bookmarking and open in new tab is now supported! Simply use your browser's bookmark manager to save this page for quick access later.
Update: We're building AI tools for the Indian Law community. Help shape the future by filling out this quick form for a chance to get a free 1-year usage of the requested tool.