Section 69 of CA, 1957 : Section 69: Offences By Companies

CA, 1957

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Imagine a scenario where 'XYZ Music Company', a well-known music company, is found guilty of infringing the copyright of a popular song by illegally selling it without the original creator's permission. At the time of the offence, Mr. John, the CEO of the company, was in charge of the company's business. According to Section 69 of The Copyright Act, 1957, both the company and Mr. John could be deemed guilty of the offence and liable for punishment.

However, if Mr. John can prove that he was unaware of the offence or that he took all necessary precautions to prevent such an offence from occurring, he may not be held liable for punishment under this Act.

Furthermore, if it is proven that the offence was committed with the consent or due to the negligence of any other officer of the company, such as the manager, secretary, or a director, they too would be deemed guilty and liable for punishment.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link