Section 27 of CA, 2002 : Section 27: Orders By Commission After Inquiry Into Agreements Or Abuse Of Dominant Position
CA, 2002
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Imagine a hypothetical scenario where a leading smartphone manufacturer, PhoneMax, has been found by the Competition Commission to hold a dominant position in the market and has been abusing its dominance by enforcing exclusive contracts with retailers, preventing them from selling competitors' smartphones.
Applying Section 27 of The Competition Act, 2002, the Commission could:
- Order PhoneMax to cease enforcing these exclusive contr...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
🚀 Special Offer! Enjoy 1 Year of Ad-Free Browsing with any subscription.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!
Update: Discover how KanoonGPT revolutionizes legal research! Watch our demo video on the homepage to see how you can chat with various legal sections using our innovative hybrid AI search. Enjoy free unlimited AI access for a limited time!
Update: Page bookmarking and open in new tab is now supported! Simply use your browser's bookmark manager to save this page for quick access later.
Update: We're building AI tools for the Indian Law community. Help shape the future by filling out this quick form for a chance to get a free 1-year usage of the requested tool.
Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app
