Section 437A of CrPC : Section 437A: Bail to require accused to appear before next appellate Court.

CrPC

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Scenario: Rajesh is accused of theft and is undergoing trial in a Sessions Court. The trial is about to conclude, and the court is ready to deliver its judgment.

Application of Section 437A: Before delivering the judgment, the Sessions Court requires Rajesh to execute a bail bond with sureties. This bond ensures that Rajesh will appear before the High Court if an appeal is filed against the Sessions Court's judgment. The bond will be valid for six months.

Outcome: Rajesh executes the bail bond with sureties. The Sessions Court delivers its judgment, and Rajesh is acquitted. However, the prosecution decides to appeal the acquittal in the High Court. Rajesh receives a notice from the High Court to appear for the appeal hearing. Since he has already executed the bail bond, he appears before the High Court as required.

Example 2:

Scenario: Priya is convicted of fraud by a Magistrate Court and sentenced to two years in prison. She decides to appeal the conviction in the Sessions Court.

Application of Section 437A: Before Priya's appeal is heard, the Magistrate Court requires her to execute a bail bond with sureties. This bond ensures that Priya will appear before the High Court if an appeal is filed against the Sessions Court's decision. The bond will be valid for six months.

Outcome: Priya executes the bail bond with sureties and files her appeal in the Sessions Court. The Sessions Court hears her appeal and reduces her sentence to one year. Unsatisfied with the reduced sentence, Priya decides to appeal further to the High Court. The High Court issues a notice for Priya to appear. Since she has already executed the bail bond, she appears before the High Court as required.

Example 3:

Scenario: Sunil is accused of assault and is undergoing trial in a Magistrate Court. The trial concludes, and Sunil is convicted and sentenced to six months in prison. Sunil decides to appeal the conviction in the Sessions Court.

Application of Section 437A: Before Sunil's appeal is heard, the Magistrate Court requires him to execute a bail bond with sureties. This bond ensures that Sunil will appear before the High Court if an appeal is filed against the Sessions Court's decision. The bond will be valid for six months.

Outcome: Sunil executes the bail bond with sureties and files his appeal in the Sessions Court. The Sessions Court hears his appeal and upholds the conviction. Sunil decides not to appeal further. However, if the prosecution had decided to appeal the Sessions Court's decision in the High Court, Sunil would have been required to appear before the High Court as per the bail bond he executed.

Example 4:

Scenario: Anjali is accused of embezzlement and is undergoing trial in a Sessions Court. The trial concludes, and Anjali is acquitted. The prosecution decides to appeal the acquittal in the High Court.

Application of Section 437A: Before delivering the judgment, the Sessions Court requires Anjali to execute a bail bond with sureties. This bond ensures that Anjali will appear before the High Court if an appeal is filed against the Sessions Court's judgment. The bond will be valid for six months.

Outcome: Anjali executes the bail bond with sureties. The Sessions Court delivers its judgment, and Anjali is acquitted. The prosecution files an appeal in the High Court, and Anjali receives a notice to appear for the appeal hearing. Since she has already executed the bail bond, she appears before the High Court as required.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link