Section 398 of CrPC : Section 398: Power to order inquiry.
CrPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: A complaint was filed against Mr. Sharma alleging that he had committed fraud. The Magistrate, after examining the complaint, dismissed it under Section 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, due to lack of sufficient evidence.
Application of Section 398: The complainant, dissatisfied with the dismissal, approached the Sessions Judge. Upon examining the record under Section 397, the Sessions Judge found that the Magistrate might have overlooked some crucial evidence. The Sessions Judge then directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate to conduct a further inquiry into the complaint. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, in turn, directed a subordinate Magistrate to re-examin...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
In fact, any online course, certificate program, diploma in International Law, Technology Law, or whatever-new-hype-they-invent is usually just marketing sugarcoat. Don't let them sell you a PDF or Recorded Content and call it empowerment.
A course designed to truly empower you should be accessible — and preferably, free. That's why KanoonGPT will launch a Free AI 101 for Law Professionals course.
Also, quick reality check: Indians earn in INR ₹₹₹ — why on earth are we paying in Dollars $$$ for AI tools ? 🤨 Something doesn't add up.
Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app
