Section 365 of CrPC : Section 365: Court of Session to send copy of finding and sentence to District Magistrate.

CrPC

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Case: Ramesh vs. State of Maharashtra

Scenario: Ramesh was tried in the Court of Session for a serious offense under the Indian Penal Code. After a thorough trial, the Court of Session found Ramesh guilty and sentenced him to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment.

Application of Section 365: After the judgment was pronounced, the Court of Session prepared a copy of the finding (guilty) and the sentence (10 years of rigorous imprisonment). This copy was then forwarded to the District Magistrate of the district where the trial was held, ensuring that the District Magistrate is informed of the outcome of the case.

Example 2:

Case: State of Tamil Nadu vs. Priya

Scenario: Priya was tried by the Chief Judicial Magistrate for a financial fraud case. After the trial, the Chief Judicial Magistrate found Priya not guilty and acquitted her of all charges.

Application of Section 365: Following the acquittal, the Chief Judicial Magistrate prepared a copy of the finding (not guilty) and, since there was no sentence, only the finding was forwarded to the District Magistrate of the district where the trial took place. This ensures that the District Magistrate is aware of the acquittal and the conclusion of the case.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link