Section 354 of CrPC : Section 354: Language and contents of judgment.

CrPC

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Scenario: Rajesh is accused of theft under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Court Proceedings:

  1. The court writes the judgment in Hindi, the language of the court.
  2. The judgment outlines the points for determination, such as whether Rajesh committed the theft.
  3. The court decides that Rajesh is guilty and provides reasons for this decision, such as witness testimonies and evidence.
  4. The judgment specifies that Rajesh is convicted under Section 379 of the IPC and is sentenced to 2 years of imprisonment.

Judgment Excerpt:

  • Language: Hindi
  • Points for Determination: Whether Rajesh committed theft.
  • Decision: Guilty
  • Reasons: Witness testimonies and evidence.
  • Offence: Section 379 of IPC
  • Punishment: 2 years of imprisonment

Example 2:

Scenario: Priya is accused of causing grievous hurt under Section 325 of the IPC, but there is doubt whether it falls under Section 325 or Section 326.

Court Proceedings:

  1. The court writes the judgment in English, the language of the court.
  2. The judgment outlines the points for determination, such as whether Priya caused grievous hurt and under which section it falls.
  3. The court decides that Priya is guilty but expresses doubt whether it falls under Section 325 or Section 326.
  4. The court passes judgment in the alternative, stating that if it falls under Section 325, Priya is sentenced to 3 years of imprisonment, and if it falls under Section 326, she is sentenced to 5 years of imprisonment.

Judgment Excerpt:

  • Language: English
  • Points for Determination: Whether Priya caused grievous hurt and under which section it falls.
  • Decision: Guilty
  • Reasons: Medical reports and witness statements.
  • Offence: Doubt between Section 325 and Section 326 of IPC
  • Punishment: 3 years if under Section 325, 5 years if under Section 326

Example 3:

Scenario: Anil is accused of murder under Section 302 of the IPC and is sentenced to death.

Court Proceedings:

  1. The court writes the judgment in Marathi, the language of the court.
  2. The judgment outlines the points for determination, such as whether Anil committed murder.
  3. The court decides that Anil is guilty and provides special reasons for awarding the death sentence, such as the brutality of the crime.
  4. The judgment specifies that Anil is convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and is sentenced to death by hanging.

Judgment Excerpt:

  • Language: Marathi
  • Points for Determination: Whether Anil committed murder.
  • Decision: Guilty
  • Reasons: Brutality of the crime.
  • Offence: Section 302 of IPC
  • Punishment: Death by hanging

Example 4:

Scenario: Sunita is accused of cheating under Section 420 of the IPC, but the court imposes a sentence of less than three months.

Court Proceedings:

  1. The court writes the judgment in Tamil, the language of the court.
  2. The judgment outlines the points for determination, such as whether Sunita committed cheating.
  3. The court decides that Sunita is guilty but imposes a sentence of 2 months of imprisonment.
  4. The court records its reasons for awarding a sentence of less than three months, such as Sunita's age and first-time offence.

Judgment Excerpt:

  • Language: Tamil
  • Points for Determination: Whether Sunita committed cheating.
  • Decision: Guilty
  • Reasons: Sunita's age and first-time offence.
  • Offence: Section 420 of IPC
  • Punishment: 2 months of imprisonment

Example 5:

Scenario: Ravi is acquitted of assault charges under Section 323 of the IPC.

Court Proceedings:

  1. The court writes the judgment in Kannada, the language of the court.
  2. The judgment outlines the points for determination, such as whether Ravi committed assault.
  3. The court decides that Ravi is not guilty and provides reasons for this decision, such as lack of evidence.
  4. The judgment specifies that Ravi is acquitted of the offence under Section 323 of the IPC and directs that he be set at liberty.

Judgment Excerpt:

  • Language: Kannada
  • Points for Determination: Whether Ravi committed assault.
  • Decision: Not Guilty
  • Reasons: Lack of evidence.
  • Offence: Section 323 of IPC
  • Acquittal: Ravi is set at liberty
Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link