Section 322 of CrPC : Section 322: Procedure in cases which Magistrate can not dispose of.
CrPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: A Magistrate in a small town in Maharashtra is conducting an inquiry into a theft case. During the inquiry, it becomes evident that the theft involved a significant amount of money and the accused has connections with organized crime.
Application of Section 322:
- The Magistrate realizes that the complexity and severity of the case are beyond his jurisdiction.
- He determines that the case should be tried by the Chief Judicial Magistrate due to its serious nature.
- The Magistrate stays the proceedings and submits the case, along with a brief report explaining the situation, to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.
- The Chief Judicial Magistrate, upon reviewing the report, decides to take over the case and proceeds with the trial.
Example 2:
Scenario: A Magistrate in a district in Uttar Pradesh is handling a case of assault. During the trial, new evidence surfaces indicating that the assault was part of a larger conspiracy involving multiple districts.
Application of Section 322:
- The Magistrate realizes that he does not have the jurisdiction to handle a case that spans multiple districts.
- He concludes that the case should be committed for trial by another Magistrate who has the appropriate jurisdiction.
- The Magistrate stays the proceedings and submits the case, along with a brief report, to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.
- The Chief Judicial Magistrate reviews the report and directs the case to a Magistrate in a neighboring district who has the jurisdiction to handle such cases.
- The new Magistrate, empowered to try the case, takes over and continues with the trial.
Example 3:
Scenario: A Magistrate in a district in Tamil Nadu is conducting an inquiry into a case of cyber fraud. During the inquiry, it becomes clear that the fraud involves multiple victims across different states and the amount defrauded is substantial.
Application of Section 322:
- The Magistrate realizes that the case is too complex and extensive for his jurisdiction.
- He determines that the case should be tried by the Chief Judicial Magistrate due to its interstate nature and the significant amount involved.
- The Magistrate stays the proceedings and submits the case, along with a brief report explaining its nature, to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.
- The Chief Judicial Magistrate, after reviewing the report, decides to take over the case and proceeds with the trial.
Example 4:
Scenario: A Magistrate in a district in West Bengal is handling a case of domestic violence. During the trial, it is revealed that the accused has a history of similar offenses in other districts.
Application of Section 322:
- The Magistrate realizes that the case should be tried by a Magistrate who has jurisdiction over multiple districts to consider the accused's history.
- He concludes that the case should be committed for trial by another Magistrate with broader jurisdiction.
- The Magistrate stays the proceedings and submits the case, along with a brief report, to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.
- The Chief Judicial Magistrate reviews the report and directs the case to a Magistrate with the appropriate jurisdiction.
- The new Magistrate, empowered to try the case, takes over and continues with the trial.