Section 317 of CrPC : Section 317: Provision for inquiries and trial being held in the absence of accused in certain cases.
CrPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: Rajesh is accused of a minor theft and is currently out on bail. His lawyer, Mr. Sharma, is representing him in court. Rajesh has a job that requires him to travel frequently, making it difficult for him to attend every court hearing.
Application of Section 317: During one of the hearings, Mr. Sharma requests the Judge to dispense with Rajesh's personal attendance, arguing that Rajesh's presence is not necessary for the interests of justice and that he is represented by a competent lawyer. The Judge, after recording the reasons, agrees and allows the trial to proceed in Rajesh's absence. However, the Judge also notes that Rajesh may be required to attend in person at a later stage if deemed necessary.
Example 2:
Scenario: Priya is accused of causing a public disturbance and is representing herself in court without...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!