Section 314 of CrPC : Section 314: Oral arguments and memorandum of arguments.

CrPC

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Scenario: Rajesh is accused of theft and is undergoing trial in a criminal court. After presenting his evidence, Rajesh's lawyer, Mr. Sharma, wants to make sure the court understands their key arguments.

Application of Section 314:

  1. Oral Arguments: After presenting all evidence, Mr. Sharma addresses the court with concise oral arguments, summarizing why Rajesh should be acquitted based on the evidence presented.
  2. Memorandum of Arguments: Before concluding his oral arguments, Mr. Sharma submits a written memorandum to the court. This document clearly outlines the key points of their defense under distinct headings, such as "Lack of Evidence," "Alibi," and "Character Witnesses."
  3. Copy to Opposite Party: Mr. Sharma simultaneously provides a copy of this memorandum to the prosecutor, ensuring they are aware of the defense's arguments.
  4. No Adjournment: The court does not grant any adjournment for filing the written arguments since Mr. Sharma has already submitted them on time.
  5. Regulation of Arguments: If Mr. Sharma's oral arguments were too lengthy or irrelevant, the judge could have intervened to ensure they remained concise and pertinent to the case.

Example 2:

Scenario: Priya is facing charges of fraud. Her lawyer, Ms. Kapoor, has just finished presenting all the evidence in her defense.

Application of Section 314:

  1. Oral Arguments: Ms. Kapoor addresses the court with a brief and focused oral argument, emphasizing the lack of direct evidence linking Priya to the fraud.
  2. Memorandum of Arguments: Before concluding her oral arguments, Ms. Kapoor submits a memorandum to the court. This document is organized under headings such as "Evidence Analysis," "Witness Credibility," and "Legal Precedents," summarizing the defense's key points.
  3. Copy to Opposite Party: Ms. Kapoor provides a copy of this memorandum to the opposing counsel, ensuring transparency and allowing them to prepare their counter-arguments.
  4. No Adjournment: The court does not grant any adjournment for filing the written arguments as Ms. Kapoor has already submitted them.
  5. Regulation of Arguments: If Ms. Kapoor's oral arguments were not concise or relevant, the judge could have directed her to focus on the key issues and avoid unnecessary details.

Example 3:

Scenario: Sunil is on trial for assault. His lawyer, Mr. Verma, has just finished presenting the defense's evidence.

Application of Section 314:

  1. Oral Arguments: Mr. Verma addresses the court with concise oral arguments, highlighting inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and presenting evidence that supports Sunil's innocence.
  2. Memorandum of Arguments: Before concluding his oral arguments, Mr. Verma submits a memorandum to the court. This document is organized under headings such as "Inconsistencies in Prosecution's Case," "Eyewitness Testimonies," and "Medical Reports," summarizing the defense's key points.
  3. Copy to Opposite Party: Mr. Verma provides a copy of this memorandum to the prosecutor, ensuring they are aware of the defense's arguments.
  4. No Adjournment: The court does not grant any adjournment for filing the written arguments as Mr. Verma has already submitted them.
  5. Regulation of Arguments: If Mr. Verma's oral arguments were too lengthy or irrelevant, the judge could have intervened to ensure they remained concise and pertinent to the case.
Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link