Section 314 of CrPC : Section 314: Oral arguments and memorandum of arguments.
CrPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: Rajesh is accused of theft and is undergoing trial in a criminal court. After presenting his evidence, Rajesh's lawyer, Mr. Sharma, wants to make sure the court understands their key arguments.
Application of Section 314:
- Oral Arguments: After presenting all evidence, Mr. Sharma addresses the court with concise oral arguments, summarizing why Rajesh should be acquitted based on the evidence presented.
- Memorandum of Arguments: Before concluding his oral arguments, Mr. Sharma submits a written memorandum to the court. This document clearly outlines the key points of their defense under distinct headings, such as "Lack of Evidence," "Alibi," and "Character Witnesses."
- Copy to Opposite Party: Mr. Sharma simultaneously provides a copy of this memorandum to the prosecutor, ensuring they are aware of the defense's arguments.
- No Adjournment: The court does not grant any adjournment for filing the written arguments since Mr. Sharma has already submitted them on time.
- Regulation of Arguments: If Mr. Sharma's oral arguments were too lengthy or irrelevant, the judge could have intervened to ensure they remained concise and pertinent to the case.
Example 2:
Scenario: Priya is facing charges of fraud. Her lawyer, Ms. Kapoor, has just finished presenting all the evidence in her defense.
Application of Section 314:
- Oral Arguments: Ms. Kapoor addresses the court with a brief and focused oral argument, emphasizing the lack of direct evidence linking Priya to the fraud.
- Memorandum of Arguments: Before concluding her oral arguments, Ms. Kapoor submits a memorandum to the court. This document is organized under headings such as "Evidence Analysis," "Witness Credibility," and "Legal Precedents," summarizing the defense's key points.
- Copy to Opposite Party: Ms. Kapoor provides a copy of this memorandum to the opposing counsel, ensuring transparency and allowing them to prepare their counter-arguments.
- No Adjournment: The court does not grant any adjournment for filing the written arguments as Ms. Kapoor has already submitted them.
- Regulation of Arguments: If Ms. Kapoor's oral arguments were not concise or relevant, the judge could have directed her to focus on the key issues and avoid unnecessary details.
Example 3:
Scenario: Sunil is on trial for assault. His lawyer, Mr. Verma, has just finished presenting the defense's evidence.
Application of Section 314:
- Oral Arguments: Mr. Verma addresses the court with concise oral arguments, highlighting inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and presenting evidence that supports Sunil's innocence.
- Memorandum of Arguments: Before concluding his oral arguments, Mr. Verma submits a memorandum to the court. This document is organized under headings such as "Inconsistencies in Prosecution's Case," "Eyewitness Testimonies," and "Medical Reports," summarizing the defense's key points.
- Copy to Opposite Party: Mr. Verma provides a copy of this memorandum to the prosecutor, ensuring they are aware of the defense's arguments.
- No Adjournment: The court does not grant any adjournment for filing the written arguments as Mr. Verma has already submitted them.
- Regulation of Arguments: If Mr. Verma's oral arguments were too lengthy or irrelevant, the judge could have intervened to ensure they remained concise and pertinent to the case.
Update: Our Pro subscription pricing is now simplified. See our Pro plans
Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.